Supreme Court has suspended the case of Zanetor at the High Court

The Supreme Court has suspended the exploit of Nii Armah Ashitey and Dr Zanetor Rawlings at the High Court until it determines a constitutional matter fresh in the accomplishment.

In a 4-1 majority decision, the apex court ruled that the High Court erred in conduct yourself bearing in mind it assumed jurisdiction on intensity of Article 94 clause 1(a) of the 1992 Constitution.

Article 94 clause 1 (a) states that a person must be a registered voter forward he or she can contest as a Member of Parliament.

The Supreme Court has so suspended the act to determine whether the said constitutional provision becomes working associated to a person declares his or her direct to be an MP at the primaries level or whether it is bearing in mind the Electoral Commission opens nominations and the person files the relevant documents.

Legal team of Dr Rawlings filed the application at the Supreme Court, praying the court to quash a ruling by the High Court to continue to hear the dogfight.

The court has appropriately solution the parties working in the lawsuit to file their submissions simultaneously within two weeks and tallying adjourned the skirmish to June 2, 2016.

Nii Armah Ashietey who aimless to Dr Rawlings last year had following to court challenging his eradicate in the November 11, 2015, primaries citing some constitutional breaches.

According to Mr Ashietey, Dr. Zanetor Rawlings did not qualify to be elected as the parliamentary nominee back at the period of the contest she was not a registered voter in the country.